Efektivitas Layanan Rehabilitasi Sosial dan Kompetensi Konselor terhadap Kualitas Hidup Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika

Ulkiyah Oktadiana; Juliannes Cadith; Agung Satrio Wicaksono

doi:10.57266/epistemik.v5i2.300

Authors

Ulkiyah Oktadiana Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Juliannes Cadith Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Agung Satrio Wicaksono Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57266/epistemik.v5i2.300

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Social Rehabilitation, Competence, Quality of Life, Narcotics

Abstract

This research is focused on finding the influence of effectiveness on quality of life, the influence of competence on quality of life and the influence of effectiveness and competence on quality of life in the Class IIA Serang prison. This research uses an associative method with a quantitative approach. The sampling technique used a saturated sampling technique, namely all correctional inmates receiving social rehabilitation services, totaling 60 people. Data were collected using a questionnaire in paper form which was distributed to all correctional inmates. Data processing uses multiple linear regression with the help of SPSS 24 to determine the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. The test results show that the significance probability value for the influence of effectiveness (X1) on quality of life (Y) is 0.098 > 0.05, which means that partially effectiveness has no significant effect on quality of life, then the significance probability value for the influence of competence (X2) on quality of life ( Y) is 0.000 < 0.05, which means that partially competence has a significant influence on quality of life and the significance value for the influence of effectiveness (X1) and competence (X2) simultaneously or combined on quality of life (Y) is 0.000 < 0.05, so it can be It was concluded that there was a simultaneous influence of effectiveness and competence on quality of life.

References

Asmawati, A., Mahendika, D., Ikhlas, A., Putri, A. M., Vanchapo, V., & Amri, N. (2023). Efektivitas Rehabilitasi Rawat Jalan Terhadap Kualitas Hidup Pengguna Narkotika. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 6(4), 4462-4468.

Ernawati, E., & Qasim, M. (2018). Pengaruh Dukungan Keluarga Dan Dukungan Konselor Adiksi Terhadap Motivasi Untuk Sembuh Pada Pecandu Narkoba Dibalai Rehabilitasi Bnn Baddoka Makassar. Journal Of Islamic Nursing, 3(1), 40-46.

Gill, T. M. (1994). A Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Quality Of-Life Measurements. Jama,272(8), 619-626.

Herdriani, P., & Samputra, P. L. (2021). Pengaruh Layanan Rehabilitasi Narkotika terhadap Kualitas Hidup Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 21(3), 1237-1244.

Lopez, &. Synder. (2003). Positive Psychological Assesment a Handbookof Models & measures . Washington: DC : APA.

Sondang P. Siagian. (2002). Kiat Meningkatkan Produktivitas kerja. (Jakarta:PT Rineka Cipta)

Strees, M. Richard. (1985). Efektivitas Organisasi. Jakarta : Erlangga

Spencer, L. M. (2012:5). Competence at Work: Model for Superior Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Spencer, S. L. (1993:9). Competence at Work, Models For Superior Performance. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Undang-Undang. (No. 13 Tahun 2013). Tentang Ketenagakerjaan : Pasal 1 (10).

Undang-Undang Nomor 35. (Tahun 2009). Tentang Narkotika.

Undang-Undang. (Nomor 12 Tahun 1995). Tentang Pemasyarakatan.

WHO. (1998). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assesment (WHOQOL): Development and General Psychometric Properties. 46(12), 1569-1585. Great Britain

Wibowo. (2007:110). Manajemen Kinerja. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada