Pasal Karet UU ITE dan Peyelesaian Konflik Digital di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57266/epistemik.v4i2.158Keywords:
#semuabisakena, Revisi UU ITE, UU ITE, Digital Repression, Digital ConflictAbstract
The Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) is a problem for several groups, namely activists, pro-democracy groups, academics and students. The ITE Law specifically regulates digital law in Indonesia. This research will answer how civil society groups have demanded a revision of the ITE Law since 2016. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. In addition, this research is based on data collected from various mass media, scientific research journals, v-dem datasets and reports from Non-Government Organizations such as SAFEnet. The results of this study conclude that the ITE Law does not resolve conflicts that occur in the online domain, but adds to existing conflicts, as evidenced by the existence of virtual politics and digital repression. The civil society movement demanding the revision of the ITE Law has had a positive impact on democracy. Meanwhile, the government that passed the ITE Law showed a trend of stagnation and a decline in democracy because it showed poor rule of law.
References
AJI Indonesia. (2021). Catatan Akhir Tahun 2021: Kekerasan, Kriminalisasi & Dampak UU Cipta Kerja. https://aji.or.id/read/buku/89/catatan-akhir-tahun-2021.html
Ambay, M. A., Gauchan, N., Hasanah, M., & Jaiwong, N. K. (2019a). Dystopia Is Now: Digital Authoritarianism and Human Rights in Asia. Gobal Campus Human Rights Journal.
Ambay, M. A., Gauchan, N., Hasanah, M., & Jaiwong, N. K. (2019b). Dystopia Is Now: Digital Authoritarianism and Human Rights in Asia. Gobal Campus Human Rights Journal.
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvdtphhq
Budiman, A. (2020, November 12). Pakar Hukum Sebut UU ITE Ganggu Iklim Demokrasi - Nasional. Tempo.Co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1404764/pakar-hukum-sebut-uu-ite-ganggu- iklim-demokrasi
Darmawan, D., Kustandi, C., & Syah, R. (2019). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding Web-based Information Openness to Increasing Political Participation in Indonesia. 642–651.
Diprose, R. (2019). Two Decades of Reformasi in Indonesia: Its Illiberal Turn. Journal of Contemporary Asia.
Foa, R. S. (2018). Modernization and Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy.
Gandesha, S. (2018). Understanding Right and Left Populism. In Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism (pp. 49–70). University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book30.d
Hadi, O. H. (2010). PERAN MASYARAKAT SIPIL DALAM PROSES DEMOKRATISASI. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 14(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v14i2.674
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001
Hennen, L., Keulen, I. Van, Korthagen, I., Aichholzer, G., Lindner, R., & Øjvind, R. (2019). European E-Democracy in Practice. Springer International Publishing.
Jandevi, U. (2019). New media for increasing political participation in Indonesia. 1(1), 1–8.
KhosraviNik, M., & Unger, J. W. (2016). Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies. Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies., November, 205–223. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283213787
Locher, D. A. (2002). Collective behavior. Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Mare, A. (2020). Internet Shutdowns in Africa: State-Ordered Internet Shutdowns and Digital Authoritarianism in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Communication.
Mietzner, M. (2012). Ideology, Money and Dynastic Leadership: The Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle, 1998–2012. South East Asia Research, 20(4), 511– 531. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2012.0123
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2007). Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society and Participation. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7428.001.0001
Nugroho, A. S. (2010). Perlindungan kebebasan berpendapat melalui media internet dalam Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang informasi dan transaksi elektronik ditinjau dari perspektif hak asasi manusia. Jurnal UNS, 1(1).
Pakpahan, R. (2021). ANALISA IMPLEMENTASI UU ITE PASAL 28 AYAT 2 DALAM MENGURANGI UJARAN KEBENCIAN DI MEDIA SOSIAL. Journal of Information System, Informatics and Computing, 5(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.52362/jisicom.v5i1.465
Permatasari, I. A., & Wijaya, J. H. (2019). Implementasi Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Ujaran Kebencian Pada Media Sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Pers Dan Komunikasi Pembangunan, 23(1).
Piliang, Y. A. (2004). Posrealitas: Realitas Kebudayaan dalam Era Posmetafisika. Jalasutra.
Polyakova, A., & Meserole, C. (2019). Exporting Digital Authoritarianism: The Russian and Chinese Model.
Power, T. P. (2018). Jokowi’s Authoritarian Turn and Indonesia’s Democratic Decline. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies.
Scott, A. W. (2021). Promoting Digital Authoritarianism: A Study of China’s Digital Silk Road. Dalarna University.
Sefsani, R., & Ziegenhain, P. (2015). Civil-society Support — A Decisive Factor in the Indonesian Presidensial Election in 2014. Journal ASIEN.
Setiawan, R., & Arista, M. O. (2013). EFEKTIVITAS UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA DALAM ASPEK HUKUM PIDANA. Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v2i2.32324
Sidik, S. (2013). Dampak Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) Terhadap Perubahan Hukum dan Sosial Dalam Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmiah WIDYA, 1(1), 1–7.
Suaedy, A. (2014). The Role of Volunteers and Political Participation in the 2012 Jakarta Gubernatorial Election. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs.
The Conversation. (2022, November 14). Apakah penurunan demokrasi global terkait dengan media sosial? Kami menyisir bukti untuk mencari tahu. https://theconversation.com/apakah-penurunan-demokrasi-global-terkait- dengan-media-sosial-kami-menyisir-bukti-untuk-mencari-tahu-194449
Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2016). Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 18(9). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448156162
Vedi R. Hadiz, & Richard Robison. (2013). The Political Economy of Oligarchy and the Reorganization of Power in Indonesia. Indonesia, 96, 35. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.96.0033
Wijayanto, Setiyono, B., Martini, R., & Elsitra, G. N. (2021). Digital Authoritarianism in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social and Political Enquiries, ICISPE 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Shinta Ressmy Cakra Ningrat, Soni Akhmad Nulhaqim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
