Measuring Service Quality at Public Service Mal in Tangerang City

Authors

  • Evanito Nur Hidayat Department of Public Administration, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Titi Stiawati Department of Public Administration, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57266/epistemik.v5i1.275

Keywords:

Service Quality, Public Services, Public Service Mall

Abstract

Based on Law Number 25 of 2009, it can be interpreted that the Government is obliged to serve the rights and needs of the community as citizens through public services. To achieve better public services, the Government innovates services through Public Service Malls (MPP) so that everyone can access government services easily and quickly without exception. One of the Public Service Malls (MPP) is held in Tangerang City, the research locus. Implementing this service innovation is directed at public satisfaction with government services. In conducting this research was carried out using descriptive quantitative methods. This research also has limitations, namely in discussing how high the quality of service is at the Tangerang City Public Service Mall (MPP) and carried out on the population of people using the Tangerang City Public Service Mall (MPP) with a total of 74,422 users. Sampling was conducted using the Slovin formula with a MoR of 10%, namely 100 respondents. This research also aims to prove the magnitude of the influence that the implementation of QRIS has on purchasing interest. To support this, respondents were determined as one of the instruments, namely using the Purposive Sampling Technique. This research shows that the Public Service Quality score at the Tangerang City Public Service Mall reached a value of 75% or obtained a percentage result of more than 60%. Of course, it is necessary to provide supporting facilities such as digital services, facilities for pregnant women or people with disabilities, a clean MPP environment, and increased human resources for service staff. The 75% service quality score at the Tangerang City Public Service Mall (MPP) was also declared good.

References

Along, A. (2020). Kualitas Layanan Administrasi Akademik di Politeknik Negeri Pontianak. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 006(01), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2020.006.01.11

Apriyani, N., Pebriani Wahyu, F., Kusuma Dewi, R., & Sunan Gunung Djati, U. (2022). Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Melalui Mal Pelayanan Publik Di Kabupaten Pandeglang. Jurnal DIALEKTIKA, 20(3), 1–16. http://jurnaldialektika.com

Ashari, A., & Sallu, S. (2023). Digitalisasi Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil. Remik, 7(1), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.33395/remik.v7i1.11984

Erlianti, D. (2019). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Dan Bisnis, 1(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.36917/japabis.v1i1.7

Fitriany, Sardi, & Badaruddin. (2022). NMaR. Https://E-Jurnal.Nobel.Ac.Id/Index.Php/NMaR, 3(PENGARUH KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK TERHADAP KEPUASAN PENUMPANG PADA PELABUHAN NUSANTARA PAREPARE), 687–701.

Hardiansyah. (2011). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Bina Media.

Ikhenoba W., & Atakpa O., E. (2023). SERVICOM and Public Service Delivery in Nigeria: A study of Akwa Ibom State University. IJRISS, VII(V).

Rahayu, F. I., Noor, M., & Amini, M. J. (2023). Inovasi Mal Pelayanan Publik Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Di Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 11(3), 18–25.

Riani, K. (2021). STRATEGI PENINGKATAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK. JIP, 1.

Riduwan, & S. (2007). Pengantar Statistika untuk Penelitian : Pendidikan Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi dan Bisnis. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryana, Y., Cahyati, H., Pratiwi, R., Septiana, A. M., Cendana, G., Rohmah, L. S., Galuh, U., Publik, P., & Banjar, K. (2014). Kualitas pelayanan publik dalam mewujudkan konsep good governance di sekretariat daerah kota banjar. 118–127.

Tawai, A., Muhammad Amir, & Almaidah. (2023). Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Melalui Penerapan Good Governance Pada Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kota Kendari. Journal Publicuho, 6(1), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v6i1.126

Tjiptono. (2012). pengaruh kualitas pelayanan dan kualitas produkterhadap keputusan pembelian.

Wibisono, A., & , S. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Jasa Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan. PERFORMANCE “ Jurnal Bisnis & Akuntansi,” 6(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.24929/feb.v6i2.268

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pelayanan Publik PermenPANRB Nomor 23 Tahun 2017 Tentang Mal Pelayanan Publik

PermenPANRB Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 Tentang Kompetisi Inovasi Pelayanan Publik

PermenPANRB Nomor 15 Tahun 2014 Tentang Standard Pelayanan Publik

PermenPANRB Nomor 63 Tahun 2003 Tentang Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik

Peraturan Walikota Nomor 66 Tahun 2018 Tentang Mal Pelayanan Publik

Downloads

Published

27-05-2024

How to Cite

Hidayat, E. N., & Stiawati, T. (2024). Measuring Service Quality at Public Service Mal in Tangerang City. Epistemik: Indonesian Journal of Social and Political Science, 5(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.57266/epistemik.v5i1.275

Issue

Section

Articles